Dossiers›Donald Trump
◼ Public record
Donald Trump
45th and 47th President of the United States. First US president convicted of felonies.
Net worth: ~$7.5 billion (Forbes, May 2026)
65+
documented offenses
$355M
civil fraud judgment (NY)
34
felony counts (NY)
The receipts are real. A jury found him guilty on 34 counts. A second jury found he sexually abused a woman and awarded $88.3 million. A third proceeding found $355 million in fraud. Two federal grand juries indicted him. A state grand jury indicted him under RICO. He launched meme coins from the presidency, took a $400 million jet from a foreign government, and pardoned a thousand people who beat police officers for him. The scale is not normal. The documentation is complete.
Jump to section
Court findings & criminal record
Criminal conviction · 2024
34 NY felony convictions — falsifying business records to conceal hush money
A Manhattan jury found Donald Trump guilty on all 34 counts of falsifying business records in the first degree. The records were falsified to conceal reimbursements to Michael Cohen for the $130,000 Stormy Daniels hush-money payment made days before the 2016 election. Trump became the first United States president convicted of felonies. Sentence: unconditional discharge (January 2025).
- —Verdict: May 30, 2024. Jury deliberated for less than two days after a six-week trial.
- —All 34 counts returned as guilty — falsifying internal Trump Org invoices, checks, and ledger entries.
- —The underlying crime triggering the felony elevation: the payment was an unlawful campaign contribution under New York election law.
- —Michael Cohen pled guilty to related federal crimes in 2018, naming "Individual-1" (Trump) as the directing party.
- —Sentencing: January 10, 2025. Judge Juan Merchan imposed an unconditional discharge — no prison time — citing Trump's pending return to the presidency.
- —Trump is the first sitting or former US president ever convicted of a criminal offense.
Sexual abuse — jury verdict · 2023
E. Jean Carroll — federal jury found Trump sexually abused her; $5M awarded
A federal jury in the Southern District of New York found Donald Trump sexually abused writer E. Jean Carroll in a Bergdorf Goodman dressing room in the mid-1990s and awarded $5 million in compensatory and punitive damages. The jury declined to find rape by the legal definition but explicitly found sexual abuse occurred. This is a court finding, not an allegation.
- —Verdict: May 9, 2023. Carroll v. Trump I, SDNY.
- —Jury found: sexual abuse (penetration without consent). Jury did not find rape under the narrow New York statutory definition.
- —$2M compensatory damages for battery; $3M compensatory for defamation (Trump called her a liar after she went public).
- —Trump did not testify at trial. His deposition was played for the jury.
- —In his deposition Trump stated that because he was a "star," women let him do whatever he wanted — echoing the Access Hollywood tape.
- —Two additional witnesses testified to similar prior acts by Trump.
Source: E. Jean Carroll v. Donald Trump, Carroll v. Trump I, SDNY — Wikipedia
Defamation — jury verdict · 2024
E. Jean Carroll defamation — $83.3M verdict for continued public attacks
A separate federal jury awarded E. Jean Carroll $83.3 million after Trump continued to publicly attack and defame her following the first trial's verdict. The second jury found Trump's statements caused additional harm to Carroll's reputation.
- —Verdict: January 26, 2024. Carroll v. Trump II, SDNY.
- —$18.3M compensatory; $65M punitive.
- —Trump continued making public statements calling Carroll a liar and a fraud after the May 2023 verdict.
- —The jury heard evidence of Trump's Truth Social posts, CNN town hall statements, and other post-verdict statements.
- —Combined Carroll judgments: $88.3M. Trump appealed.
Civil fraud — court judgment · 2024
NY civil fraud judgment — $355M+ for systematic overvaluation of Trump Org assets
Justice Arthur Engoron found Trump, the Trump Organization, and Trump's adult sons liable for persistent and repeated fraud in the overvaluation of Trump Org assets to obtain favorable loan rates and insurance terms. The judgment totaled $355 million plus interest. Trump was also banned from serving as an officer of any New York corporation for three years.
- —Decision: February 16, 2024. People of the State of New York v. Trump, NY Supreme Court.
- —Brought by NY AG Letitia James. Case: James v. Trump.
- —Mar-a-Lago valued at up to $739M in financial statements; actual value assessed by court at $17.5-75M.
- —Engoron: "The frauds found here leap off the page and shock the conscience."
- —Eric Trump, Don Trump Jr., and Allen Weisselberg were co-defendants. Weisselberg pled guilty to perjury separately.
- —Bond of $175M posted (reduced by appeals court); full judgment with interest approached $500M.
Consumer fraud — settlement · 2016
Trump University — $25M settlement for defrauding students
Trump settled three class-action and state lawsuits over Trump University for $25 million without admitting wrongdoing. State attorneys general had found that instructors had no real estate expertise, students were pressured into high-cost "elite" packages, and the program issued no actual degrees or accreditation despite marketing itself as a university.
- —Settlement: November 2016, days after Trump won the presidential election.
- —NY AG, CA AG, and federal class-action suits consolidated.
- —Students paid up to $35,000 for "elite" mentorship programs promised to teach Trump's personal real estate secrets.
- —Instructors were recruited via Craigslist and had no special expertise; scripts directed them to pressure students into upsells.
- —NY AG Eric Schneiderman had called it "a straight-up fraud." Trump had previously said he would not settle.
Source: Trump University — Wikipedia
Charity fraud — dissolution · 2018
Trump Foundation dissolved — NY AG found charity funds used for personal benefit; $2M fine
The Donald J. Trump Foundation was dissolved in December 2018 under a court-supervised agreement after the New York Attorney General found Trump had used foundation funds for personal and business purposes, including $258,000 to settle legal disputes for his businesses. Trump was ordered to pay $2 million in damages.
- —Foundation assets distributed under court supervision.
- —$258,000 from the foundation used to settle legal disputes for Trump businesses — a self-dealing violation.
- —$10,000 purchase of a portrait of Trump with foundation funds.
- —Foundation made a $25,000 donation to a Florida AG's PAC — the same AG weighing whether to investigate Trump University.
- —Court-ordered $2M payment to eight charities. Trump banned from NY nonprofit boards for eight years.
Federal indictment — dismissed · 2023
Federal indictment — 37 counts for willful retention of national defense information at Mar-a-Lago
Special Counsel Jack Smith indicted Trump on 37 federal counts including willful retention of national defense information, obstruction, and false statements for keeping classified documents at Mar-a-Lago after leaving office and obstructing the government's attempts to retrieve them. Judge Aileen Cannon dismissed the case in July 2024 on appointment-clause grounds. The conduct documented in the indictment is not in dispute.
- —Indictment: June 9, 2023. US v. Trump, SD Fla.
- —Documents included materials related to US nuclear programs, military capabilities, and foreign intelligence.
- —Trump was caught on tape telling a biographer that he had a classified Pentagon document he could not declassify as a private citizen.
- —Mar-a-Lago staff were directed to move boxes of documents to evade government retrieval.
- —Co-defendant Walt Nauta, Trump's valet, was charged with obstruction.
- —Cannon dismissed on a novel appointment-clause theory rejected by every other court that reviewed it.
Source: Federal prosecution of Donald Trump (classified documents) — Wikipedia
Federal indictment — dismissed · 2023
Federal indictment — 4 counts for conspiracy to defraud the United States / Jan 6 election interference
Special Counsel Jack Smith indicted Trump on four federal counts including conspiracy to defraud the United States, obstruction of an official proceeding, and conspiracy against rights for his role in the effort to overturn the 2020 election results culminating in January 6. The case was dismissed in January 2025 by the Justice Department after Trump won the 2024 election, as DOJ policy bars prosecution of a sitting president.
- —Indictment: August 1, 2023. US v. Trump, DDC.
- —The case survived a Supreme Court ruling — Smith's superseding indictment was rewritten to focus on unofficial conduct.
- —DOJ dismissed the case January 2025 upon Trump's return to office per the OLC opinion barring prosecution of a sitting president.
- —The Smith final report documented evidence that Trump knew he had lost and pressed ahead regardless.
- —Jack Smith stated in the report that the evidence was sufficient to obtain a conviction.
Source: Federal prosecution of Donald Trump (election obstruction) — Wikipedia
State indictment — paused · 2023
Georgia RICO indictment — 13 counts including racketeering, soliciting a public officer to violate oath
Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis indicted Trump and 18 co-defendants on RICO and related charges for their efforts to overturn Georgia's 2020 election results. Predicate acts include the Raffensperger call and the fake electors scheme. The case is paused pending an appeal of Willis's disqualification motion.
- —Indictment: August 14, 2023. State of Georgia v. Trump et al.
- —13 counts against Trump including violation of the Georgia RICO Act and soliciting a public officer to violate their oath.
- —The Raffensperger call ("find 11,780 votes") is a named predicate act.
- —Four co-defendants pled guilty and agreed to cooperate: Sidney Powell, Kenneth Chesebro, Jenna Ellis, Scott Hall.
- —Willis faced a disqualification motion over her relationship with lead prosecutor Nathan Wade; Wade resigned; case paused on appeal.
Source: Georgia election racketeering prosecution — Wikipedia
Election denial — the Big Lie
Election interference · 2021
"Find 11,780 votes" — recorded call to Georgia's Secretary of State
On January 2, 2021, Trump called Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger and demanded he "find" exactly 11,780 votes — one more than Biden's Georgia margin. The call was recorded. Raffensperger refused. The call is a named predicate act in the Georgia RICO indictment.
- —Trump: "I just want to find 11,780 votes, which is one more than we have. Because we won the state."
- —Trump also warned Raffensperger he was taking "a big risk" by refusing to act.
- —Georgia election officials had already certified Biden's win following a hand recount and a machine recount.
- —Raffensperger's chief legal counsel Ryan Germany was on the call. Raffensperger told Trump his data was wrong.
- —The full call recording was obtained by The Washington Post and published January 3, 2021.
Election interference · 2020-2021
60+ election lawsuits lost — including by Trump-appointed judges
Trump and his allies filed more than 60 lawsuits in Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, New Mexico, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin seeking to overturn the 2020 election results. Every significant case was dismissed. Multiple Trump-appointed judges wrote opinions explicitly stating that no evidence of fraud sufficient to affect the outcome was found.
- —More than 60 suits filed across 7 states. Not a single court found sufficient evidence of fraud to affect the outcome.
- —Trump-appointed Judge Stephanos Bibas (3rd Cir.): "Calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here."
- —Trump-appointed Judge Brett Ludwig (E.D. Wis.): "This is not a matter of preventing election fraud... the record demonstrates that they were unable to find proof of fraud."
- —Courts dismissed the cases for lack of standing, lack of evidence, laches, or on the merits.
Source: Legal challenges to the 2020 United States presidential election results — Wikipedia
Election interference · 2020-2021
Fake electors scheme — fraudulent electoral slates submitted in 7 states
Trump allies submitted fraudulent slates of Trump electors in seven states won by Biden to Vice President Pence and the National Archives. The plan was for Pence to count the fake slates instead of the certified Biden electors. Pence refused. More than 84 individuals have been charged across multiple state prosecutions.
- —The Eastman memos (December 2020) show the architects knew the strategy was legally unsound.
- —Fake slates were signed and submitted by Republican Party officials in all 7 states: AZ, GA, MI, NV, NM, PA, WI.
- —Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, and Wisconsin have charged fake electors or co-conspirators.
- —18 co-defendants indicted in Georgia RICO case for their roles in the scheme.
- —Mark Meadows, Trump's chief of staff, coordinated the effort per Jan 6 Committee findings.
Source: Fake electors plot — Wikipedia
Election denial — intentionality documented · 2020
AG Barr told Trump directly the fraud claims were "bullshit" — Trump continued anyway
Attorney General William Barr testified to the January 6 Committee that he told Trump personally in November and December 2020 that the fraud claims were "bullshit." Trump continued to amplify the claims. This testimony documents that Trump knew the claims were false while continuing to broadcast them.
- —Barr met with Trump at the White House on November 23, 2020 and told him directly that the DOJ investigations had turned up no evidence sufficient to change the election outcome.
- —Barr's exact words, per his deposition: "I told him that the stuff that his people were shoveling out to the public was bullshit."
- —Trump pressed Barr on specific claims; Barr told him each had been investigated and rejected.
- —Barr resigned December 23, 2020. Trump continued the fraud claims through January 6 and beyond.
Source: United States House Select Committee on the January 6 Attack — Wikipedia
Election denial — intentionality documented · 2020-2021
WH Counsel Cipollone, Hope Hicks, Mark Meadows all documented advising Trump his claims were false
White House Counsel Pat Cipollone told Trump the legal theories behind overturning the election had no merit. Hope Hicks testified Trump cared about claiming victory regardless of factual basis. These depositions are in the Jan 6 Committee's final report (December 2022).
- —Cipollone deposition: testified that he repeatedly told Trump the strategies — including the Eastman plan — were without legal basis.
- —Hope Hicks: testified that Trump prioritized the political optics of challenging the result over whether the underlying claims were factually supported.
- —The Jan 6 Committee's final report concluded Trump was aware the claims were false and pressed forward regardless.
- —The final report was released December 22, 2022 and ran 845 pages.
Source: Final Report of the January 6th Committee — Wikipedia
Election denial — amplification of known falsehoods · 2023
Fox News paid $787.5M to Dominion — hosts knew the claims were false; Trump amplified them anyway
Fox News settled Dominion Voting Systems' defamation suit for $787.5 million in April 2023. Discovery documents showed Fox hosts privately knew the fraud claims were false while broadcasting them. Trump publicly amplified those same claims throughout this period.
- —Settlement: April 18, 2023. Dominion Voting Systems v. Fox News Network.
- —Carlson internal text (Nov 19, 2020): "Sidney Powell is lying by the way. I caught her. It's insane."
- —Hannity internal message: "Sidney is a complete nut. No one will work with her. Ditto with Rudy."
- —Fox chose to broadcast the claims anyway — fearing audience loss to Newsmax and OAN.
- —Trump repeatedly amplified the Dominion fraud claims — the same claims Fox hosts knew were false while broadcasting them.
Source: Dominion Voting Systems v. Fox News Network — Wikipedia
January 6 — inciting insurrection
Inciting insurrection · 2021
The Ellipse speech — told the crowd to march on the Capitol; 4 officers died, 140 injured
On January 6, 2021, Trump addressed thousands of supporters at the Ellipse near the White House. He told them to march to the Capitol, said Pence would need to "do the right thing," and said they needed to "fight like hell." The crowd then breached the Capitol, assaulted police, and disrupted the certification of the 2020 election. Four officers died in the aftermath; 140 officers were injured.
- —Trump's speech ran approximately 70 minutes. He repeatedly told the crowd to march to the Capitol.
- —Trump knew the crowd was armed: Secret Service and WH staff briefed him on weapons in the crowd before he took the stage.
- —Pence was evacuated from the Senate chamber minutes after Trump publicly criticized him on Twitter during the assault.
- —140 police officers sustained injuries ranging from concussions to crushed spinal discs to lost fingers.
- —The Capitol was not breached in a major assault since the British burned it in 1814.
Inciting insurrection · 2021
187 minutes of inaction — Trump refused to call off the crowd for 3+ hours
During the Capitol assault, Trump refused to call off the crowd for approximately 187 minutes despite repeated pleas from his family, senior aides, and Republican congressional leaders. He was watching the assault on television in the White House dining room.
- —Ivanka Trump went to the Oval Office multiple times to plead with her father to call off the crowd. He did not.
- —WH aide Cassidy Hutchinson testified about the frantic atmosphere and Trump's refusal to act.
- —McCarthy testified Trump said the rioters "are more upset about the election than you are."
- —Trump finally released a video at 4:17 PM telling rioters "we love you" and "you're very special."
- —Trump tweeted a new attack on Pence at 2:24 PM — during the assault — while staff was urging him to call off the crowd.
Source: United States House Select Committee on the January 6 Attack — Wikipedia
Inciting insurrection · 2022
Jan 6 Committee criminal referrals — four charges including obstruction and inciting insurrection
The House Select Committee on January 6 voted to refer Donald Trump to the Department of Justice on four criminal charges: obstruction of an official proceeding, conspiracy to defraud the United States, conspiracy to make a false statement, and inciting, assisting, or aiding insurrection. The first such referral of a president in US history.
- —Criminal referrals voted: December 19, 2022.
- —The committee also referred John Eastman, Mark Meadows, Rudy Giuliani, and Jeffrey Clark to the DOJ.
- —The referral on inciting insurrection was the first of a president in US history.
- —Jack Smith's August 2023 indictment covered overlapping conduct under different charges.
Source: Final Report of the January 6th Committee — Wikipedia
Inciting insurrection · 2025
Jack Smith final report — Trump knew he had lost and pressed ahead with the fake-electors scheme
Special Counsel Jack Smith's final report, released publicly in January 2025 before Trump's inauguration, documented evidence that Trump was informed he had lost the 2020 election and pressed ahead with the fake-electors scheme and January 6 pressure campaign regardless. Smith stated the evidence was sufficient to obtain a conviction.
- —Report released January 7, 2025 — the day after the fourth anniversary of the Capitol attack.
- —Smith: "The evidence was sufficient to obtain and sustain a conviction at trial."
- —The report documented Trump's state of mind including specific briefings telling him the fraud claims were false.
- —Smith wrote that the only reason the case was not brought to trial was the DOJ policy against prosecuting a sitting president.
Source: Jack Smith — Wikipedia
Constitutional violations — second term
Constitutional violation · 2025
Birthright citizenship EO — directly contradicts the 14th Amendment; 22 states filed suit
On his first day in office, Trump signed an executive order attempting to end automatic citizenship for children of undocumented immigrants born on US soil. The 14th Amendment explicitly states: "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States." Multiple federal courts issued immediate nationwide injunctions. Twenty-two states filed suit.
- —EO signed January 20, 2025 — Day 1 of the second term.
- —Three separate federal district courts issued injunctions within days, calling the order unconstitutional on its face.
- —The 14th Amendment birthright citizenship clause was ratified in 1868 specifically to overrule Dred Scott v. Sandford.
- —22 states filed suit — the broadest multi-state coalition against a presidential order in modern US history.
Source: Birthright citizenship in the United States — Wikipedia
Constitutional violation · 2025
Schedule F — converting tens of thousands of civil servants to at-will political employees
Trump signed Schedule F on Day 1 of his second term, converting tens of thousands of career federal civil servants to "at-will" employees removable without cause. The order is designed to enable mass purges of civil servants who fail ideological loyalty tests, gutting the nonpartisan federal workforce.
- —Schedule F was first signed in Trump's first term (October 2020) and immediately revoked by Biden on his first day.
- —The second-term version was signed January 20, 2025.
- —Career civil servants are protected by the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 precisely to prevent politicization of federal administration.
- —Thousands of federal workers received termination notices within weeks; courts issued mixed rulings on legality.
Source: Schedule F — Wikipedia
Constitutional violation · 2025
Impoundment of congressional appropriations — Article I power of the purse violated
The Trump administration refused to spend funds Congress had appropriated for foreign aid, climate programs, university research, and other items. The Constitution vests the power of the purse in Congress; the Impoundment Control Act of 1974 was passed specifically to prevent presidents from nullifying congressional spending by refusing to release the money.
- —USAID foreign aid funds were frozen within days of inauguration; programs across dozens of countries halted.
- —Climate program funds allocated by the Inflation Reduction Act were frozen despite being congressionally mandated.
- —University research grants were frozen in an attempt to coerce universities on political grounds.
- —Federal courts repeatedly ordered funds released; the administration complied partially and slowly.
Constitutional violation · 2025
DOGE — unconfirmed, unauthorized access to federal payment systems and personnel records
Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency, operating without Senate confirmation or statutory authority, gained access to Treasury payment systems, federal personnel databases, and Social Security records. Federal courts issued emergency injunctions finding the access unauthorized. DOGE initiated mass firings of tens of thousands of career civil servants.
- —DOGE had no statutory basis — it was not created by Congress and its head was not Senate-confirmed.
- —DOGE accessed the Treasury's payment system — which processes $6 trillion in annual federal payments — without standard authorization.
- —Courts found that DOGE operatives lacked the security clearances and legal authority to access the systems they entered.
- —DOGE targeted agencies that regulate Musk's own companies — NHTSA (Tesla), FDA (Neuralink), FAA (SpaceX).
Abuse of emergency powers · 2025
Tariffs as personal leverage — used explicitly to extract political concessions and donations
Trump announced, paused, and modified emergency-powers tariffs based on stock-market reaction and individual company calls with Trump. Reporting documented the tariffs being used as leverage to extract corporate donations, political concessions from foreign governments, and favorable coverage from media companies.
- —Trump announced sweeping "Liberation Day" tariffs April 2, 2025; paused them 90 days later as markets crashed.
- —Individual companies and foreign governments reported being told to negotiate directly with the White House for exemptions.
- —Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney described overt linkage between tariff levels and Canadian political concessions.
- —Legal scholars noted that emergency tariff authority was being used beyond its statutory scope with no genuine national emergency predicate.
Source: Trump tariffs (2025) — Wikipedia
Muslim ban
Religious discrimination · 2017
Muslim Ban — EO 13769 barred entry from 7 Muslim-majority countries; chaos at airports
Executive Order 13769, signed January 27, 2017, banned entry from Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen for 90 days and suspended refugee admissions. Legal permanent residents were detained at airports. Federal courts immediately halted the order.
- —Signed without advance coordination with DHS, State Department, or CBP — causing immediate chaos.
- —Hundreds of people in transit when the order was signed were detained upon landing, including green card holders.
- —Federal courts in multiple circuits halted the order within days.
- —The Trump administration issued three successive revised versions attempting to cure the legal defects.
Religious discrimination · 2015-2017
"Total and complete shutdown of Muslims" — Giuliani admitted Trump asked him to make the ban "legal"
Trump called for "a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States" at a December 2015 rally. Rudy Giuliani later admitted on Fox News that Trump asked him to find a way to make the Muslim ban "legal." This documented intent was cited by federal courts in finding impermissible religious targeting.
- —Trump's December 7, 2015 statement in Mount Pleasant, SC: "Donald J. Trump is calling for a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States."
- —Giuliani Fox News interview (January 29, 2017): "He said to me 'Look, I'd like you to show me the right way to do it legally.'"
- —The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals cited Trump's own statements in ruling the ban reflected anti-Muslim animus.
Religious discrimination · 2018
Trump v. Hawaii — SCOTUS 5-4 upheld ban; Sotomayor dissent compared ruling to Korematsu
The Supreme Court upheld the third version of the travel ban 5-4 in June 2018. Justice Sotomayor's dissent, joined by Justice Ginsburg, explicitly compared the majority's reasoning to Korematsu v. United States — the 1944 ruling that upheld Japanese American internment.
- —Decision: June 26, 2018. Trump v. Hawaii, 585 U.S. 667.
- —Sotomayor dissent: "The Court's decision today has a troubling parallel to Korematsu v. United States... Our Constitution demands that we not turn a blind eye when a President uses his power to target an entire religious community."
- —The ban remained in effect until Biden revoked it on his first day in office, January 20, 2021.
- —An estimated 41,000 visa applications were denied between 2017 and 2020 as a direct result of the bans.
Source: Trump v. Hawaii — Wikipedia
Religious discrimination · 2017-2021
Human cost — 41,000+ visas denied; refugee admissions cut from 85,000 to 15,000/year
The Muslim bans resulted in approximately 41,000 visa application denials between 2017 and 2020. Refugee admissions were cut from approximately 85,000 in 2016 to a cap of 15,000 in 2021. Thousands of families were separated.
- —41,000+ visa applications denied directly tied to the travel bans (2017-2020).
- —Refugee admissions: FY2016 (Obama): ~84,994; FY2020 (Trump): ~11,814; FY2021 cap set at 15,000.
- —The caps cut refugee resettlement to the lowest levels since the modern refugee system was established in 1980.
- —Affected individuals included people who had worked alongside US military forces in Iraq and Afghanistan.
- —Biden rescinded the bans on January 20, 2021. Trump reinstated similar restrictions on Day 1 of his second term.
Source: Trump travel ban — Wikipedia
ICE as state-violence apparatus
Immigration enforcement / state violence · 2025
Sensitive-location protections ended — ICE began arresting people at hospitals, churches, and schools
Trump ended the Obama-era ICE policy that protected hospitals, churches, schools, and courthouses from immigration enforcement operations. ICE agents began making arrests at courthouses during active proceedings, in hospital waiting rooms, and outside school buildings.
- —The sensitive-locations policy dated to 2011; it directed ICE agents to avoid enforcement actions at or near schools, churches, hospitals, and courts.
- —Documented cases emerged of ICE arrests at: a hospital in Texas during a patient's treatment; outside elementary schools in multiple states; in courthouse hallways during civil proceedings.
- —Immigration attorneys documented a chilling effect: immigrants stopped attending court proceedings and medical appointments out of fear of arrest.
- —Crime reporting by immigrant communities also declined as community members feared contact with police would lead to deportation.
Source: U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement — Wikipedia
Immigration enforcement / state violence · 2025
Mahmoud Khalil — green card holder detained for pro-Palestinian campus speech; First Amendment challenge
Mahmoud Khalil, a Columbia University graduate student and lawful permanent resident, was detained by ICE in March 2025 for his role in organizing pro-Palestinian campus protests. He was held without criminal charge. The administration sought to deport him on national-interest grounds.
- —Khalil had a green card — lawful permanent resident status. He was not a criminal defendant.
- —No criminal charges were filed. The deportation attempt was based on the Secretary of State's authority to remove noncitizens deemed a threat to US foreign policy.
- —Khalil's attorneys argued the detention was retaliation for constitutionally protected speech and assembly.
- —Courts issued preliminary injunctions blocking deportation while the First Amendment challenge proceeded.
Source: Mahmoud Khalil — Wikipedia
Immigration enforcement / state violence · 2025
El Salvador CECOT renditions — 200+ Venezuelans deported to mega-prison without judicial review
The Trump administration deported more than 200 Venezuelan men to CECOT, El Salvador's maximum-security mega-prison, without judicial review. Some of those deported were US lawful permanent residents. Courts issued emergency orders blocking the program; the administration invoked the 1798 Alien Enemies Act.
- —The Alien Enemies Act of 1798 has been used only three times in US history — all during declared wars.
- —Federal courts found the invocation of the AEA legally deficient: no declared war exists.
- —Some of the deported individuals had no criminal records; at least one was a US lawful permanent resident.
- —The Supreme Court issued emergency orders requiring return of at least one wrongly deported individual; compliance was delayed.
Source: Alien Enemies Act — Wikipedia
Immigration enforcement / state violence · 2025
"Alligator Alcatraz" — tent detention facility in the Everglades named by Trump; conditions documented as substandard
A tent detention facility was constructed on Everglades-adjacent land in Florida for immigration detainees. Trump publicly named it "Alligator Alcatraz." ACLU monitors and legal advocates documented conditions violating basic detention standards.
- —Trump announced the facility's nickname on social media, framing the surrounding wildlife as a deterrent.
- —Legal monitors documented: inadequate access to lawyers, insufficient medical care, extreme heat conditions.
- —ACLU filed emergency motions regarding conditions; courts ordered access for legal advocates.
- —The naming and framing of the facility as punishment was intentional: Trump described it approvingly as a deterrent.
Source: U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement — Wikipedia
Extrajudicial killings
Extrajudicial killing — war powers violation · 2020
Soleimani assassination — killed on Iraqi soil without congressional authorization
A US drone strike at Baghdad International Airport on January 3, 2020 killed Qassem Soleimani, commander of Iran's IRGC Quds Force. The strike was executed without congressional authorization, without Iraqi government consent, on Iraqi territory. Iraq's parliament voted to expel US forces in response.
- —Soleimani was killed while traveling on Iraqi soil — not on an active battlefield.
- —No congressional authorization existed for killing a foreign state's senior military official.
- —Iraq's parliament passed a non-binding resolution calling for the expulsion of US forces.
- —Iran launched ballistic missile strikes on US bases in Iraq in retaliation; 110 US service members suffered traumatic brain injuries.
- —The Senate passed a bipartisan War Powers Resolution 55-45 after the strike; Trump vetoed it.
Extrajudicial killing — war powers violation · 2025
Yemen strikes 2025 — sustained US military campaign; War Powers Resolution vetoed
Trump launched a sustained US military campaign against Houthi positions in Yemen in 2025. Multiple strikes hit civilian infrastructure. Congress passed War Powers Resolutions attempting to require authorization; Trump vetoed them.
- —The campaign began March 2025 with strikes on Houthi positions across Yemen.
- —Multiple reports documented strikes on non-military sites including ports and civilian infrastructure.
- —A bipartisan War Powers Resolution passed both chambers; Trump vetoed it.
- —The strikes were not authorized under the 2001 or 2002 AUMFs.
Source: Yemen civil war — Wikipedia
Sovereignty violations
Sovereignty violations · 2025
Greenland / Panama / Canada annexation rhetoric — military aircraft sent over Greenland; tariff warfare against Canada
Trump publicly and repeatedly stated intentions to "take" Greenland (a Danish autonomous territory), retake the Panama Canal, and annex Canada as the 51st state. He sent US military surveillance aircraft over Greenland without Danish consent and imposed escalating tariffs on Canada as explicit economic warfare.
- —Trump sent US military reconnaissance flights over Greenland in January 2025 without Danish government consent.
- —Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen: "Greenland belongs to the Greenlandic people. Greenland is not for sale and will never be for sale."
- —Canada tariffs: Trump imposed 25% tariffs on Canadian goods, calling them necessary to make Canada the "51st state."
- —The Panama Canal threats alarmed Latin American governments and prompted emergency consultations among regional leaders.
Source: Donald Trump's statements about Greenland — Wikipedia
2026 Iran war
2026 Iran war — unauthorized strikes · 2026
US-Israel strikes on Iran — no congressional declaration; 3,468+ killed including 376 children
Beginning February 28, 2026, the United States and Israel launched coordinated military strikes on Iran targeting nuclear sites, military installations, and government facilities. Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and senior Iranian officials were killed. Iranian government counts and HRANA reported 3,468+ Iranians killed including 376 children and 496 women. No congressional declaration of war was obtained.
- —No congressional authorization was sought or obtained before the strikes began.
- —The UN Security Council could not act due to US and Israeli vetoes.
- —The strikes killed Iran's Supreme Leader — the head of state of a sovereign nation — constituting an act of war under international law.
- —3,468+ killed per Iranian government and HRANA counts: 376 children, 496 women.
- —Legal scholars documented violations of the War Powers Resolution and the UN Charter.
Source: 2026 Iran war — Wikipedia
2026 Iran war — war crimes documentation · 2026
Minab school bombing — 165+ killed, mostly children; DIA provided outdated targeting data
An Israeli airstrike hit the Shajareh Tayyebeh girls' elementary school in Minab, Hormozgan province, southern Iran, killing 165+ people — mostly children — and injuring 96. A preliminary investigation found the US Defence Intelligence Agency had provided outdated targeting data that wrongly labeled the school as a military target. UNESCO called it "a grave violation of humanitarian law."
- —165+ killed; 96 injured. The school was in session when struck.
- —A preliminary investigation found the DIA had provided targeting data that misidentified the school building.
- —UNESCO statement: "This is a grave violation of humanitarian law. Educational institutions must never be targets."
- —Amnesty International: "Those responsible for this deadly and unlawful strike... must be held accountable."
- —The US administration did not acknowledge DIA responsibility or open a public investigation.
Source: Amnesty International, March 2026; UN News, March 2026
Conflicts of interest
Conflicts of interest · 2022-2025
Saudi LIV Golf — Trump properties hosted tournaments while he lobbied for LIV-PGA merger
The Saudi-funded LIV Golf tour held multiple tournaments at Trump-owned golf properties. Trump lobbied aggressively for a LIV-PGA merger while simultaneously negotiating US-Saudi arms deals. Saudi Arabia's Public Investment Fund channeled tournament revenue to Trump Organization through hosting fees.
- —LIV Golf, funded by Saudi Arabia's PIF sovereign wealth fund, held tournaments at Trump National Bedminster and Trump International Doral.
- —Trump repeatedly advocated for the LIV-PGA merger in public statements.
- —Saudi arms deals advanced during the same period Trump was publicly championing Saudi golf interests.
- —No formal disclosure of the financial benefit to the Trump Organization from LIV hosting fees was made.
Source: LIV Golf — Wikipedia
Conflicts of interest · 2017-2021
Emoluments Clause — foreign governments booked Trump International Hotel DC to curry favor
Foreign governments and delegations booked rooms, held events, and spent money at the Trump International Hotel on Pennsylvania Avenue during Trump's first term. Legal scholars and multiple states argued this violated the Foreign Emoluments Clause. The litigation was mooted by Trump's departure from office before reaching a merits ruling.
- —Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Malaysia, and other governments booked the Trump hotel for events during Trump's presidency.
- —The DC Circuit Court and other federal courts heard the Emoluments cases; all were mooted after Trump left office.
- —The hotel earned tens of millions of dollars during Trump's presidency; Trump's financial interest was never divested.
- —Because the cases were mooted, no court has ruled on the merits of whether the bookings violated the Constitution.
Source: Trump International Hotel, Washington, D.C. — Wikipedia
Conflicts of interest · 2017-2021
Secret Service billed Trump properties for rooms and golf carts — taxpayers funded self-dealing
The Secret Service agents protecting Trump at his own golf properties were charged for hotel rooms, golf carts, and accommodations at those properties — meaning the government paid Trump's own businesses to protect him. Totals ran into the millions of dollars.
- —Secret Service paid up to $650/night for rooms at Trump Bedminster during presidential visits.
- —The Washington Post, Government Accountability Institute, and House Oversight Committee all documented the payments.
- —Trump visited his own golf properties more than 400 times during his first term.
- —No other president has owned commercial hospitality properties in which the government was simultaneously a paying customer.
Conflicts of interest · 2021
Jared Kushner — $2B Saudi investment in his fund six months after leaving the White House
Six months after leaving the White House, Jared Kushner's private equity firm Affinity Partners received a $2 billion commitment from Saudi Arabia's Public Investment Fund. The PIF's own advisory board recommended against the investment, citing Kushner's inexperience. Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman approved it over the board's objections.
- —The PIF investment committee recommended against the deal.
- —MBS approved it personally over his own advisory board's objections.
- —Kushner's WH portfolio had included Middle East policy, including US-Saudi relations.
- —Affinity Partners had no established track record when the $2B commitment was made.
- —Senate Finance Committee investigation raised questions about whether the investment was compensation for White House access.
Source: Affinity Partners — Wikipedia
Conflicts of interest · 2025
Qatar offered a $400M Boeing 747 "gift" — constitutional scholars called it an unprecedented emoluments question
Qatar offered a $400 million Boeing 747-8 to be used as Air Force One and then transferred to Trump's presidential library. The Trump administration explored accepting it. Constitutional scholars noted that a $400M gift from a foreign government to a sitting president constitutes one of the most significant potential emoluments violations in US history.
- —The Boeing 747-8 is Qatar's royal family's personal jet, estimated at $400M.
- —The arrangement would transfer the aircraft first to the US Air Force, then to Trump's presidential library.
- —The Foreign Emoluments Clause bars the president from receiving "any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State" without congressional consent.
- —Congress has not consented to the gift.
Source: Trump administration's plans to accept a Qatari aircraft — Wikipedia
Crypto scams
Crypto pump-and-dump · 2025
$TRUMP meme coin — launched 3 days before inauguration; insiders held 80% of supply; retail investors lost hundreds of millions
Three days before his second inauguration, Trump launched the $TRUMP meme coin via CIC Digital LLC, a Trump-controlled entity. The token pumped to $75 within days. Approximately 80% of the supply was held by Trump-affiliated entities who could sell into retail buyer demand. Retail investors lost hundreds of millions of dollars as insiders held the float.
- —Launched January 17, 2025 — three days before inauguration.
- —CIC Digital LLC, a Trump Organization affiliate, controlled the token distribution.
- —~80% of total supply allocated to Trump-affiliated entities.
- —The token pumped to $75 on speculative retail demand; it subsequently lost more than 70% of its peak value.
- —Retail buyers had no disclosure of the insider supply concentration at launch.
Source: $TRUMP — Wikipedia
Crypto pump-and-dump · 2025
$MELANIA meme coin — launched 2 days after $TRUMP; further extracted retail capital
Two days after the $TRUMP launch, the $MELANIA meme coin was launched in an identical pattern. The dual launches concentrated retail speculative demand across two tokens controlled by Trump-affiliated entities, further extracting capital from retail investors.
- —Launched January 19, 2025 — one day before inauguration.
- —Same structural pattern as $TRUMP: insider-heavy allocation, retail-facing launch, presidential platform promotion.
- —The $MELANIA launch cannibalized some of the $TRUMP rally, causing $TRUMP to drop approximately 50% upon the $MELANIA announcement.
- —Retail investors lost money on both tokens. Trump-affiliated entities profited on both.
Source: $MELANIA — Wikipedia
Crypto pump-and-dump · 2024-2025
World Liberty Financial / USD1 — Abu Dhabi sovereign wealth fund invested $2B in Trump family's DeFi project
World Liberty Financial, a DeFi project affiliated with the Trump family, launched a USD1 stablecoin. MGX, an Abu Dhabi sovereign wealth fund, invested $2 billion in USD1 for use in a Binance deal. A foreign sovereign wealth fund investing $2 billion in the sitting president's personal financial venture while the administration negotiates US policy toward the UAE and Binance.
- —World Liberty Financial was promoted by Trump and his sons during the 2024 campaign.
- —USD1 stablecoin issued; MGX (Abu Dhabi) invested $2B for use in a Binance acquisition deal.
- —Binance was simultaneously seeking US regulatory relief; its founder Changpeng Zhao had pled guilty to federal charges.
- —Trump subsequently pardoned Changpeng Zhao ("CZ") in 2025.
Financial manipulation · 2024
Trump Media DJT — $4.1M revenue, $9B market cap peak; SPAC irregularities
Trump Media & Technology Group went public via SPAC merger, giving Trump a stake worth billions despite the company generating $4.1 million in revenue in 2023. The SPAC merger involved multiple SEC disclosure irregularities. The market cap reflected speculative political sentiment rather than any underlying business value.
- —FY2023 revenue: $4.1M. Net loss: $58.2M.
- —Market cap peaked near $9B — valuing the company at more than 2,000x annual revenue.
- —The SPAC — Digital World Acquisition Corp — settled SEC fraud charges for $18M related to undisclosed merger talks.
- —The stock is widely understood to trade as a political proxy, not a business valuation.
Financial manipulation · 2022-2024
Trump Digital Trading Cards — multiple NFT drops sold to political base; revenue to Trump-licensed entities
Trump launched multiple "Trump Digital Trading Card" NFT drops, licensing his name and likeness to entities that sold the NFTs to his political base. Revenue flowed to Trump-licensed entities. The drops were launched while Trump was a declared presidential candidate.
- —First drop: December 2022. NFTs priced at $99 each; sold out within 12 hours.
- —NFT buyers received no ownership of underlying intellectual property — only a license to display the image.
- —Revenue flowed to NFT INT LLC, a Trump-licensed third party.
Hush money & kill stories
Hush money / media manipulation · 2016
AMI "catch and kill" — Karen McDougal paid $150K to bury affair account; illegal campaign contribution
American Media Inc. (parent of the National Enquirer) paid Karen McDougal $150,000 to acquire and bury her account of an affair with Trump. AMI signed a non-prosecution agreement with the DOJ admitting the payment was made to help Trump's 2016 campaign — making it an illegal corporate campaign contribution.
- —AMI paid McDougal $150,000 for her life story rights, then buried the story.
- —AMI's NPA with the DOJ: AMI admitted the payment was made "in coordination with and at the request of" the Trump campaign.
- —CEO David Pecker admitted operating a "network of informers" — a system for catching and killing negative Trump stories.
- —The McDougal story was suppressed from August 2016 through the election.
Source: Karen McDougal — Wikipedia
Hush money / media manipulation · 2016
Stormy Daniels $130K payment — Cohen pled guilty to FEC violations; "Individual-1" directed the scheme
Michael Cohen paid Stormy Daniels $130,000 from his own funds — later reimbursed by Trump — to suppress her account of an affair. Cohen pled guilty to federal election law violations, naming "Individual-1" (Trump) as the party who directed and benefited from the payment. This payment is the factual core of Trump's 34 felony convictions.
- —Payment made October 27, 2016 — eleven days before the election.
- —Cohen's guilty plea (August 2018): named Trump as "Individual-1," the candidate who directed the unlawful contribution.
- —Reimbursements were made via monthly installments disguised as legal retainer payments — the falsified business records at the center of the NY trial.
- —Cohen served 3 years in federal prison on the related charges.
Hush money / media manipulation · 2024
David Pecker testimony — confirmed catch-and-kill operated at Trump's request; systematic and intentional
AMI CEO David Pecker testified under oath at Trump's New York trial that the catch-and-kill arrangement operated at Trump's request and for Trump's benefit, and that he maintained a network of sources to identify and kill negative stories about Trump.
- —Pecker was the prosecution's first witness at the NY trial.
- —He described a meeting in Trump Tower in August 2015 where the arrangement was established: Pecker would act as Trump's "eyes and ears."
- —Pecker confirmed the McDougal and Daniels payments were consistent with this arrangement.
- —Pecker entered into an immunity agreement with the DA in exchange for his testimony.
Source: People v. Trump — Wikipedia
Sexual misconduct
Sexual misconduct — court findings · 2023
E. Jean Carroll — jury finding of sexual abuse (court record, not allegation)
A federal jury found Trump sexually abused E. Jean Carroll in a department store dressing room in the mid-1990s. This is a court finding, not an allegation. The jury awarded $5 million. The finding stands regardless of Trump's denials.
- —This is not listed as an allegation. The jury's finding is a legal fact.
- —Trump stated he did not know Carroll. The judge found the statement defamatory given the jury's finding.
- —Carroll's account was corroborated by two witnesses who testified she told them about the assault contemporaneously.
- —The jury's specific finding was sexual abuse (digital penetration without consent).
Sexual misconduct — documented statements · 2016
Access Hollywood tape — Trump described conduct that constitutes sexual assault
A 2005 recording captured Trump describing uninvited sexual touching of women: "I just start kissing them... I don't even wait... when you're a star, they let you do it. You can do anything. Grab 'em by the p***y." Trump dismissed this as "locker room talk." Legal experts noted the described conduct constitutes sexual assault under most state statutes.
- —Recording made September 16, 2005. Published by The Washington Post on October 7, 2016.
- —Trump was 59 years old when the recording was made.
- —Trump's formal response was an apology calling it "locker room banter."
- —More than 20 women came forward in the weeks after the tape was published with their own accounts.
Sexual misconduct — allegations · 1980s-2020s
25+ named accusers — harassment to assault; Carroll verdict is the adjudicated finding
At least 25 women have publicly accused Trump of sexual misconduct ranging from harassment to assault. These are allegations, not adjudicated findings. The E. Jean Carroll verdict (2023) is the single court-adjudicated finding of sexual abuse.
- —Named accusers include: Jessica Leeds, Kristin Anderson, Jill Harth, Rachel Crooks, Mindy McGillivary, Natasha Stoynoff, Summer Zervos, Cathy Heller, Temple Taggart, Karena Virginia, Jennifer Murphy, and others.
- —Multiple accusers described Trump kissing them without consent — mirroring his Access Hollywood description.
- —Several accusers first went public in the immediate aftermath of the Access Hollywood tape.
- —The Carroll verdict establishes that at least one account was found credible by a jury.
Source: Donald Trump sexual misconduct allegations — Wikipedia
Sexual misconduct — associations · 1990s-2002
Jeffrey Epstein — decade-long social relationship; Trump quoted calling him "terrific guy" who liked women "on the younger side"
Trump and Jeffrey Epstein socialized for more than a decade at Mar-a-Lago and New York events. In 2002, Trump told New York Magazine: "I've known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy. He's a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side." No court has found Trump participated in Epstein's crimes.
- —Trump quote, New York Magazine, 2002: cited above.
- —Epstein was a regular at Mar-a-Lago, which Trump owned.
- —Stacey Williams publicly described Epstein introducing her to Trump at Mar-a-Lago in 2016.
- —No court has found Trump participated in Epstein's trafficking crimes. The documented social relationship and Trump's own 2002 quote are the facts presented here.
Source: Jeffrey Epstein — Wikipedia
Abuse of clemency
Abuse of clemency · 2020
First-term pardons — Manafort, Stone, Flynn, Bannon, Blackwater Nisour Square contractors
Trump's first-term pardons included his campaign chairman (Manafort — bank and tax fraud), his political operative (Stone — obstruction and perjury), his first National Security Advisor (Flynn — lying to the FBI), his advisor (Bannon — fraud, pre-trial), and four Blackwater military contractors convicted in the Nisour Square massacre in Baghdad that killed 17 Iraqi civilians.
- —Paul Manafort: convicted on 8 counts of bank and tax fraud. Pardon: December 23, 2020.
- —Roger Stone: convicted on 7 counts including obstruction, witness tampering, and lying to Congress. Pardon: December 23, 2020.
- —Michael Flynn: pled guilty twice to lying to FBI agents. Pardon: November 25, 2020.
- —Steve Bannon: indicted for fraud (diverting We Build the Wall donor funds). Pardoned pre-trial, January 20, 2021.
- —Blackwater contractors: convicted in the Nisour Square massacre (September 16, 2007, Baghdad). 17 Iraqi civilians killed, 24 wounded. Pardons: December 22, 2020.
Abuse of clemency · 2025
January 6 mass pardons — ~1,500 defendants pardoned Day 1, including those convicted of violent assault on officers
On his first day back in office, January 20, 2025, Trump pardoned approximately 1,500 individuals charged or convicted in connection with the January 6 Capitol attack. The pardons included people convicted of violently assaulting police officers.
- —Pardons issued Day 1 of second term, January 20, 2025.
- —The pardons covered approximately 1,500 individuals from misdemeanor trespassers to those convicted of felony assault on law enforcement.
- —Officers including Michael Fanone and Harry Dunn publicly stated the pardons were a personal betrayal.
- —Some pardoned individuals had made statements explicitly saying they acted on Trump's direction.
Source: Pardon of January 6 United States Capitol attack participants — Wikipedia
Abuse of clemency · 2025
Pardon market allegations — payments to Trump-adjacent figures; House investigation opened
Multiple cases emerged of individuals associated with Trump allies receiving pardons after significant payments to political figures close to Trump. A formal investigation was opened by the House Judiciary Committee.
- —Multiple individuals received pardons after making substantial political contributions to figures in Trump's orbit.
- —The pattern was reported by multiple investigative outlets including ProPublica and The New York Times.
- —House Judiciary Committee opened an investigation into the allegations.
- —These are ongoing allegations; no criminal charges have been filed as of this writing.
30,573 documented falsehoods
30,573 documented falsehoods · 2017-2021
Washington Post documented 30,573 false or misleading claims — accelerating to 39/day in Year 4
The Washington Post Fact Checker documented 30,573 false or misleading claims over Trump's four-year first term. The rate of false claims accelerated sharply over time: approximately 6 per day in Year 1, rising to 39 per day in Year 4.
- —Tracking period: January 20, 2017 through January 20, 2021.
- —Year 1 rate: ~6 false or misleading claims per day.
- —Year 4 rate: ~39 false or misleading claims per day.
- —Total: 30,573 documented false or misleading claims.
- —Categories include: false economic claims, false crime statistics, COVID-19 misinformation, and the 2020 election Big Lie.
Family enrichment in office
Family enrichment in office · 2018
Ivanka China trademarks — 13 trademarks approved on same day Xi dined at Mar-a-Lago and Trump tweeted ZTE support
While serving as a White House senior advisor, Ivanka Trump's brand received 13 Chinese trademark approvals on May 28, 2018 — the same day Xi Jinping dined with her father at Mar-a-Lago and Trump tweeted he was working to save Chinese telecom firm ZTE from US sanctions.
- —Ivanka Trump was a senior White House advisor when the trademarks were approved.
- —The 13 trademarks covered products including jewelry, handbags, and spa services.
- —On the same day: Xi-Trump dinner at Mar-a-Lago; Trump's ZTE tweet; 13 Ivanka trademark approvals in China.
- —Trump ZTE tweet: "President Xi of China, and I, are working together to give massive Chinese phone company, ZTE, a way to get back into business, fast."
Source: Ivanka Trump's brand — Wikipedia
Family enrichment in office · 2017
Kellyanne Conway OGE violation — used TV appearance to promote Ivanka's clothing line; OGE recommended discipline; no discipline imposed
While serving as Counselor to the President, Kellyanne Conway used a Fox & Friends appearance to explicitly promote Ivanka Trump's clothing line: "Go buy Ivanka's stuff... Go buy it today, everybody." The Office of Government Ethics formally recommended discipline under 5 CFR 2635.702. No substantive discipline was imposed.
- —Conway appearance: February 9, 2017.
- —Context: Nordstrom had dropped Ivanka's clothing line citing sales performance. Trump attacked Nordstrom on Twitter; Conway followed with the on-air commercial.
- —OGE letter: recommended "appropriate disciplinary action" against Conway under the prohibition on using public office for private gain.
- —White House Counsel Don McGahn told OGE that Conway had been "counseled." No formal discipline was imposed.
Source: Kellyanne Conway — Wikipedia
Family enrichment in office · 2016
Ivanka 60 Minutes bracelet — PR alert sent to retailers promoting $10,800 bracelet worn in post-election interview
The day after the post-election 60 Minutes interview in which Ivanka wore a $10,800 bracelet from her own line, her brand's publicists sent a "style alert" promoting the bracelet to fashion editors and retailers. The company disavowed the alert without identifying the individual responsible.
- —60 Minutes interview aired November 13, 2016.
- —Style alert sent November 14, 2016 by a publicist working for Ivanka's brand.
- —The bracelet retailed for $10,800.
- —Ivanka's company disavowed the alert and claimed it violated company policy; no one was identified as responsible.
Source: Ivanka Trump's brand — Wikipedia
Throughline
Trump is not an aberration. He is the apex predator of the system this site documents. Heritage built the policy infrastructure. Citizens United built the donor architecture. The Powell Memo built the consent engineering. Trump is what happens when all converge in one person: a billionaire-class operator with the religious-right constituency, the donor-class money, the Heritage policy spine, and the post-Citizens United legal cover to act with no check. The dossier does not end here. The receipts are ongoing.
Last updated: 2026-05-09
Editorial note
Every entry in this dossier is sourced to court records, congressional testimony, government reports, or primary-source journalism. Verdicts are labeled precisely: court findings are distinguished from allegations, settlements are not presented as admissions unless the settling party made admissions (as AMI did with the DOJ). The E. Jean Carroll sexual abuse finding is a court finding, not an allegation, and is labeled accordingly.
This connects to
◼ List of charges
01
Corruption of Democracy
25 – life
Statute: Knowing and sustained interference with democratic processes — including manufactured election-fraud claims after losing a free election, fake-electors schemes, pressure on state officials to alter vote counts, incitement of insurrection to obstruct certification, and mass dissemination of falsehoods about election integrity — as documented by court findings, congressional reports, sworn testimony of former officials, and verifiable public-record falsehoods.
Basis: 34 NY felony convictions for falsifying business records to influence an election; fake-electors scheme in 7 states; Raffensperger 'find 11,780 votes' call; Jan 6 incitement; 30,573 documented false claims including intentional Big Lie per Barr/Cipollone/Hicks testimony; Dominion defamation amplified knowingly
02
War Crimes
30 – life
Statute: Direct authorization or material facilitation of unlawful killings, attacks on civilian infrastructure, or other grave breaches of the laws of armed conflict — including extrajudicial assassination on third-country territory without authorization, strikes on non-belligerent states without congressional or UN authorization, and pardons of contractors convicted for unlawful killings of civilians.
Basis: Soleimani assassination on Iraqi soil without congressional authorization; 2026 US-Israel strikes on Iran without war declaration; Minab girls' school bombing (165+ dead, mostly children); Yemen strikes; Blackwater Nisour Square perpetrators pardoned
03
Use of NDA to Suppress Sexual Misconduct
5 – 15 years
Statute: Deployment of non-disclosure agreements, payments, or legal threats to silence victims of sexual harassment, assault, or misconduct — per documented settlement.
Basis: AMI catch-and-kill scheme (Karen McDougal, Stormy Daniels); Cohen directed to commit FEC crimes; Pecker testimony confirms direction; $787.5M Dominion settlement for broadcasts hosts knew were false
04
Financial Fraud
10 – 25 years
Statute: Sustained falsification of financial statements, business records, or asset valuations to defraud lenders, insurers, taxing authorities, or the public — established by jury verdict, civil judgment, or regulatory finding.
Basis: $355M NY civil fraud judgment for systematic asset overvaluation; $25M Trump University settlement; $2M Trump Foundation fine; crypto pump-and-dump ($TRUMP, $MELANIA, World Liberty Financial); Kushner $2B Saudi fund over advisory board objections; Qatar 747 emoluments
Total sentence
70–196 years
That is
0.9–2.5 life sentences
(using 78 years as one life)
At $1 million per day
Donald Trump's fortune would last 2,053 years
26.3 lifetimes of luxury — before running out.
These are moral charges, not legal ones. The actual legal system has not — and will not — bring them.